Difference between revisions of "Chat Solution"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | '''Wed 17/1/18''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll email you all to come and take a look. Please could you let me know if the comments etc. I've made here are fair? | ||
| + | [[File:Marks for ATH 2017 OWLs.xlsx]] | ||
| + | Should I be less whingy? Change anything? Please let me know! | ||
| + | I think as a minimum we should get 370/469 which is 79% so really excellent! I am quite miffed about some of the marking scheme's weightings and points for arbitrary things but not others, but oh well!! | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
'''Tue 16/1/18''' | '''Tue 16/1/18''' | ||
Waiting impatiently for the solution!! They have updated the main site to show that the title *was* Another Fine Mess (yay!) and the themes: 'Mess, Messy, Messier'. Since Mark W had said there were no points for guessing the title, I guess we won't lose points for not stating those themes, either. Wondering now though if I should have done a summary of all the themes!! Ah well. --[[User:JoC|JoC]] ([[User talk:JoC|talk]]) 12:35, 16 January 2018 (GMT) | Waiting impatiently for the solution!! They have updated the main site to show that the title *was* Another Fine Mess (yay!) and the themes: 'Mess, Messy, Messier'. Since Mark W had said there were no points for guessing the title, I guess we won't lose points for not stating those themes, either. Wondering now though if I should have done a summary of all the themes!! Ah well. --[[User:JoC|JoC]] ([[User talk:JoC|talk]]) 12:35, 16 January 2018 (GMT) | ||
:There is more there to have got than I thought there would be, but there is a huge amount we DID get! I think we'll be in the top 12... ?! Who wants to mark with me - it would be good it at least two of us have a go and compare what we think. Now I have to go back to work, having barely been able to look at the solution! xxx --[[User:JoC|JoC]] ([[User talk:JoC|talk]]) 12:56, 16 January 2018 (GMT) | :There is more there to have got than I thought there would be, but there is a huge amount we DID get! I think we'll be in the top 12... ?! Who wants to mark with me - it would be good it at least two of us have a go and compare what we think. Now I have to go back to work, having barely been able to look at the solution! xxx --[[User:JoC|JoC]] ([[User talk:JoC|talk]]) 12:56, 16 January 2018 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 17 January 2018
Wed 17/1/18
I'll email you all to come and take a look. Please could you let me know if the comments etc. I've made here are fair? File:Marks for ATH 2017 OWLs.xlsx Should I be less whingy? Change anything? Please let me know! I think as a minimum we should get 370/469 which is 79% so really excellent! I am quite miffed about some of the marking scheme's weightings and points for arbitrary things but not others, but oh well!!
Tue 16/1/18
Waiting impatiently for the solution!! They have updated the main site to show that the title *was* Another Fine Mess (yay!) and the themes: 'Mess, Messy, Messier'. Since Mark W had said there were no points for guessing the title, I guess we won't lose points for not stating those themes, either. Wondering now though if I should have done a summary of all the themes!! Ah well. --JoC (talk) 12:35, 16 January 2018 (GMT)
- There is more there to have got than I thought there would be, but there is a huge amount we DID get! I think we'll be in the top 12... ?! Who wants to mark with me - it would be good it at least two of us have a go and compare what we think. Now I have to go back to work, having barely been able to look at the solution! xxx --JoC (talk) 12:56, 16 January 2018 (GMT)
